[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>
- To: Jean-Baptiste Soufron <jbsoufron@free.fr>
- Cc: jm@poure.com, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far'
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:08:21 -0400
- Organization: Real Measures
Jean-Baptiste Soufron wrote:
>
> Sometimes the law is absolutetely the opposite of what is written in the
> text... Sometimes it's approaching but there are some very precise
> differences...
The Commission's Directive on "computer-implemented inventions" (snicker)
would have codified the EPO's practice. But you are not addressing the
question:
1) Is software patentable in the first place?
2) Why is the EPO granting software patents?
Seth
--
DRM is Theft! We are the Stakeholders!
New Yorkers for Fair Use
http://www.nyfairuse.org
[CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc
I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or distribution of
this incidentally recorded communication. Original authorship should be
attributed reasonably, but only so far as such an expectation might hold for
usual practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
exclusive rights.
- Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', (continued)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)