[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Jean-Baptiste Soufron <jbsoufron@free.fr>
To: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far'
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:36:46 +0200

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:01:14 -0400
Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org> wrote:

>
> Jean-Baptiste Soufron wrote:
> >
> > 3. The provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article shall exclude
> > patentability of the subject matter or activities referred to in
> > that provision only to the extent to which a patent application or
> > patent relates to such subject matter or activities as such
> >
> > Which means that, even if a program for computer cannot not patented
> > as such, an invention involving a software can still be patented.
>
>
> It means software can't be patented.
>
> "Computer-implemented inventions" means "we will patent software as
> such."

It means that, even if a program for computer cannot not be patented as
such, an invention involving a software can still be patented.

Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', (continued)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)