[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Jean-Baptiste Soufron <jbsoufron@free.fr>
To: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far'
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:44:42 +0200

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:48:30 -0400
Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org> wrote:

> The words
> > "as such" used in part 3 simply means that the items described in
> > part 2 can't be patented when they are alone but that it is still
> > possible to patent an invention that would make some use of them.

The words
"as such" used in part 3 simply means that the items described in part 2
can't be patented when they are alone but that it is still possible to
patent an invention that would make some use of them.

:-)

We have a knot of interpretation here... I suggest we stop this
discussion for a while ok? :-)
Let's keep to something more simple : no to software patents!

voila

Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', (continued)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)