[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Rui Miguel Seabra <rms@1407.org>
To: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far'
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:24:35 +0100
Organization: 1407 Org

On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 11:05, Jean-Baptiste Soufron wrote:
> But, why do you think jurists are the main problem? Do you also have
> books about it? Maybe it's off-topic.

Because patent lawyers are in great part behind software patents.

> And many computer scientists are look-alikes who just concentrate on
> proprietary solutions that they sell to ignorant people because it's a
> good business...

We're not discussing Free vs non-Free software but software patents,
which is completely independent of copyright law based licencing.

Please drop this theme.

Rui
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', (continued)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)