[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Rui Miguel Seabra <rms@1407.org>
To: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far'
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:50:34 +0100
Organization: 1407 Org

On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 12:45, Jean-Baptiste Soufron wrote:
> Not lawyers please, Intellectual Property Counsellors offices... Call
> them what you want but please... :-)

There is no 'intellectual property', that's a term coined to pretend
that Patent Law, Copyright Law, Trademark Law and others are one and the
same in the minds of people.

These are lawyers, or juridic counsellors, who are specialised in
software patents.

Calling them "patent lawyers" is both clearer and shorter.

Rui

--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', (continued)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)