[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Simo Sorce <simo.sorce@xsec.it>
To: Jean-Baptiste Soufron <jbsoufron@free.fr>
Cc: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far'
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 00:37:59 +0200
Organization: Xsec s.r.l.

On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 11:45, Jean-Baptiste Soufron wrote:

> It's just not the job of computer scientists to write law and
> it's not the job of jurists to understand computer science. Both
> interact on each other and the only thing needed is communication and
> explanations.

You are perfectly right, let computer-scientist tell lawyers what they
need, and let lawyers correctly codify into the law computer-scientist
needs.

But, do not let lawyers codify laws for computer-scients based on
non-computer-scients interests (except for general public interest).

You are going to make a bad service as lawyer if you serve interests of
third parties.

Simo.

--
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce@xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399

Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', (continued)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)