[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Rui Miguel Seabra <rms@1407.org>
To: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far'
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 13:02:08 +0100
Organization: 1407 Org

On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 12:50, Seth Johnson wrote:
> Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> > The software part is not an invention and should never be patentable.
> . . . is not patentable.

In Europe, but not the case of the US or Japan :|

My phrase should probably be reread as:

The software part is not an invention. It is not and should never be
patentable.

Rui

--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Patents] newsscan: Software patent limits 'go too far', (continued)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)