[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- To: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: Drop Clause 3
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:45:23 +0200 (CEST)
> I think we should tell the EPC to eliminate paragraph 3, for the reasons
> detailed below.
>
> Or if the pro-software patent forces start moving for changing the EPC, we
> should say, "Sure, drop paragraph 3 until you address the real question."
>
> I think it would be best to just do it ourselves.
This proposal has already been in
http://swpat.ffii.org/analysis/epc52/
for a while and it has also been pronounced in public by a french
politician
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eubsa-swpat0202/mamere020228/
--
Hartmut Pilch, FFII & Eurolinux Alliance tel. +49-89-18979927
Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
270,000 votes 2000 firms against software patents http://noepatents.org/
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)