Re: [Patents] Re: Drop Clause 3

[Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>]

You can move on it now.  You have the Parliament vote now.

Seth

Hartmut Pilch wrote:
> 
> > I think we should tell the EPC to eliminate paragraph 3, for the reasons
> > detailed below.
> >
> > Or if the pro-software patent forces start moving for changing the EPC, we
> > should say, "Sure, drop paragraph 3 until you address the real question."
> >
> > I think it would be best to just do it ourselves.
> 
> This proposal has already been in
> 
>         http://swpat.ffii.org/analysis/epc52/
> 
> for a while and it has also been pronounced in public by a french
> politician
> 
>         http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eubsa-swpat0202/mamere020228/
> 
> --
> Hartmut Pilch, FFII & Eurolinux Alliance              tel. +49-89-18979927
> Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation       http://swpat.ffii.org/
> 270,000 votes 2000 firms against software patents    http://noepatents.org/

-- 

DRM is Theft!  We are the Stakeholders!

New Yorkers for Fair Use
http://www.nyfairuse.org

[CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc

I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or distribution of
this incidentally recorded communication.  Original authorship should be
attributed reasonably, but only so far as such an expectation might hold for
usual practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
exclusive rights.