Sorry my wrong reading!!Re: [Patents] A suspected insert

["Jacek Gancarson Eurofresh" <jacek.gancarson@eurofresh.se>]

I am very sorry if I have hurt you Harmut

I read wrong this meaning. It was tired reading this meaning.
Of course it is in the spirit of  the directive.
It is a very clear meaning. Cancel my last post here and delete it from your
archives and HDs, please!
I read wrongly the meaning as the oposite!
Sorry I have to rest.

Best regards
Jacek Gancarson

my English touched
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacek Gancarson Eurofresh" <jacek.gancarson@eurofresh.se>
To: <patents@aful.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 11:41 PM
Subject: [Patents] A suspected insert


> http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/europarl0309/demands/
> The second part of the meaning completly contradicts the first part of the
> meaning and the spirit of the amendmnds themselves:
>  1. We urge the members of the EU Council of Ministers to
>       unambiguously support the spirit of the directive draft as amended
by
> the European Parliament,
> ***i.e. to make sure that any patents on computing and business logic in
> whatever verbal clothing, granted in the past or in the future, will not
be
> upheld in court.***
>
>
> This meaning is against the spirit of the directive draft, passed by the
> European Parlament. This meaning simply means 100% support for patenting
of
> software and these crazy business methods!!! What is going on realy? It
> depreciates the whole our concept and logics! Who has proposed this
meaning?
> The personal explanation wanted!
>
> Jacek Gancarson
> www.eu3d.com
>
>
>
>