[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: David Holden <dh@iucr.org>
- To: <patents@aful.org>
- Subject: UK government position
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:54:21 +0000
- Organization: IUCr
On Monday 24 Nov 2003 11:38 am, Carles Comes wrote:
> Does anybody know which are the next steps about the Directive on the
> patentability of computer-implemented inventions?.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Carles Comes
I recently got a reply from Stephen Timms MP (Minister responsible for
Intellectual property in UK). Suffice to say It was not very encouraging.
It stated that the UK position was the result of a wide-ranging consultation
carried out in 2000 that supported clarification of the current law and the
continued restriction on patentability of "business methods" software. It
also said that the UK had been granting patents for "software related
inventions" for decades without hindering the development of open source
software.
The tenor of the letter seemed to be pro patents, and did not really address
any of my concerns with regard to the use of open software in our business,
I found it quite disheartening.
Dave.
--
Dr. David Holden. (Systems Developer)
Crystallography Journals Online: <http://journals.iucr.org>
Thanks in advance:-
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See: <http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html>
UK Privacy (R.I.P) : http://www.stand.org.uk/commentary.php3
Public GPG key available on request.
-------------------------------------------------------------
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)