[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- To: Jim Bessen <jbessen@researchoninnovation.org>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Business Week Commentary
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 23:15:45 +0100 (CET)
> A ban also would fly in the face of history. For more than a century,
> notes Harvard Business School professor Josh Lerner, experts with
> different axes to grind have argued that existing patent code isn't
> suitable to emerging technologies, ranging from railroads and
> pharmaceuticals to genetically modified organisms. But time and again,
> the law has evolved to encompass the nuances of new technologies. Lerner
> believes it's far better to let the rules work themselves out than to
> make industry-specific or technology-specific exemptions, such as
> Europeans are proposing for software. Such exemptions, he says,
> invariably become the subject of fierce lobbying motivated by
> self-interest and profit motives, not by notions of justice or social
> benefit.
When did Lerner say these things?
Given how the writer is misrepresenting our side, I wouldn't wonder if he
made this one up.
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)