[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>
- To: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] EPO grants Acacia patent on video streaming]
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:48:40 +0100
* Jonas Bosson <jonas@illuminet.se> [2004-01-19 15:48:30 +0100]:
<snip>
> Would it work? A legal process against EPO might be a way to stop the
> commission. No one politician wants to be affiliated with a criminal in
> public.
I've already had this idea in mind and wrote this on one of the
ffii-lists some time ago ...
Well, I personally would think a legal process against EPO would be
at least a good signal for politicians. It should show that the EPO
is probably doing something wrong. Such a process would of course take
quite a long time (as all today's legal processes), so it wouldn't
really matter if we win or not, if the process lasts long enough.
Having a postivie judgement before the next important vote would
of course be much better.
IMHO it is important to show the world, that the EPO is doing criminal
acts. Whether we're able to send those folks to prison someday is
written on another paper - but definitively marking the EPO as "criminal"
would probably bring us much points in the fight.
Would you agree/disagree ? Why ?
Who would have the resources to go to court ? FFII ?
cu
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT services
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: contact@metux.de
cellphone: +49 174 7066481
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Diese Mail wurde mit UUCP versandt. http://www.metux.de/uucp/
Re: [Patents] EPO grants Acacia patent on video streaming],
Gregory Aharonian
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)