[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Jonas Bosson <jonas@illuminet.se>
- To: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- Cc: Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr>, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] EC-court?
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:43:13 +0100
mån 2004-01-19 klockan 15.24 skrev Hartmut Pilch:
> We would of course only oppose the patent on grounds of lack of technical
> character.
How about the EC-Court?
... I know you probably been here before, but here I go:
It would be big-time to sue EPO for neglecting art 52, running their own
agenda and for covering patents on plain information-handling with
technology-terminology. We could state that computer-programs are
information tools, and patents on how to handle information intrudes on
methods of reasoning and and freedom of thought. We could set a bigger
stage with a motive, a monopoly driven industry running risks of a
transition from industrial to knowledge society.
It could perhaps bind the amendments to EC-law='information freedom',
rather than start tangle with the term "computer-invention" and its
like.
/Jonas
Re: [Patents] EPO grants Acacia patent on video streaming],
Gregory Aharonian
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)