[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
To: Jonas Bosson <jonas@illuminet.se>
Cc: Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr>, patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] EC-court?
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 21:49:45 +0100 (CET)

> While opposing Acacia might have some merit for ffii or other
> organisations, it is also time-consuming and we are already Caselaw can be
> influenced by ndr obligation to do a few other things, see

Sorry, the last sentence is broken, must read "we are already under
obligation ..."

Re: [Patents] EPO grants Acacia patent on video streaming], (continued)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)