[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: "Roberto Micarelli" <mi.ro@iol.it>
To: "patents" <patents@aful.org>
Subject: Re:[Patents] Australia to reject ban on business method patents
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:53:55 +0100

>...
>
> But Webber urged the government to provide the Australian Patent Office
> with more resources and training to ensure that it only grants patents
> to business systems that are truly inventive.
>
> ...

What provisions and training would be enought in order to ensure
true innovation? How many businesses are monthly invented and
deployed in the world? Is prior art coming from a small market
worth being considered? Who can do that?
This (urgent!) request is the proof of the bug.
Patenting business methods is a practice of human resource
massive consumption. When resources will be exhausted we'll
have no memory slots to add.

Roberto Micarelli

Re:[Patents] Australia to reject ban on business method patents, Roberto Micarelli

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)