[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'stef@zoomata.com' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 23:36, Hartmut Pilch wrote:
> The leaked letter 
> 
>   Halloween 10: Microsoft transactions to SCO
>   http://www.opensource.org/halloween/halloween10.html
> 
> does not only reveal that SCO's reckless lawsuits are financed by
> Microsoft, but also that they are trying to acquire patents in order to be 
> able to intensify their suing campaign.

I wouldn't give too much credit to this 'halloween' document regarding
the SCO suit.  And anyway we already knew that Microsoft was going to
intensify its patent enforcement: they surely didn't hire Phelps for
organizing parties in the campus. Here is a story about this issue:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/34391.html

And for those that would like to read a comment on 'halloween X' read: 
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/36066.html

ciao
stef


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)