[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'sedrati@bigfoot.com' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)



Henrion Benjamin a écrit :
X-[SPAM bigfoot]:
This is a demonstration why people who are aware of their privacy should
fight software patents. Juridical terrorism in the information society
will began once software patents are enforceable in front of a court,
and it will force you to lower your level of privacy. Here is why... If
you have other views, please make comments or ask for an english
version.

I fully agree with you Benjamin. But your reply takes the risk to mix copyright issues with patent issues, doesn't it. First you are explaining the problem with attachments of proprietary formats as a copyright problem (freedoms attached to free softwares vs lack of freedom of proprietary softwares). Then, you are moving on sw patent issue. Both are unrelated, except that swpats are a weapon to kill free software. Maybe you should insist more on that : you are talking about swpats only because it's a weapon of massive destruction against the free world ;-)

--
    ~     Gérald Sédrati-Dinet (Gibus)
   'v'
  // \\   mailto:sedrati@bigfoot.com
 /(   )\  http://gibuskro.lautre.net/
  ^`~'^

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature




(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)