[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Simo Sorce <simo.sorce@xsec.it>
- To: Gancarson <jacek.gancarson@eurofresh.se>
- Cc: Russell McOrmond <russell@flora.ca>, Patent forum <patents@aful.org>
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Software is not hardware, social sciences are not natural sciences.
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:28:28 +0100
- Organization: Xsec srl
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 11:00, Gancarson wrote:
> So if software is patentable, it is enough to envelope literally every idea
> in a software to get patent on it. Then if such social intangibles as
> business methods became patentable, it is obvious that softwared hardware
> producers will insist even much more harder on implementation of their own
> package of exclusive rights.
The king is nude, we all know, we just need to open as much eyes as
possible, imho.
> A lot of lobbying goes of course through the World Trade Organization
> (moving more and more up in the hills;-(.
Lobbying? The WTO is litterally _constituted_ on such interests, is
there a single sane legislation they've made?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce@xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Garofalo, 39 - 20133 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2953 4143 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
- Re: [Patents] Software is not hardware, social sciences are not natural sciences., (continued)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)