[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
|
Just wanted to bring this up with
everyone.
Erik was saying that the TBA board are the
ones who the EPO refer to for interpretation of the "as such"
clause.
This quite surprised me because to me the "as such"
clause seems pretty straightforward. (mind you a lot of things that seem
straightforward to the rest of us seem complicated to the EPO) Let's
recap,
"(3) The
provisions of paragraph
2 shall exclude patentability of the subject-matter or activities referred
to in that provision only to the extent to which a European patent application
or European patent relates to such subject-matter or activities as such.
"
To me this clause is saying that while inventions
that include software are allowable, the patent application cannot extend
patentability to the computer program itself.
I certainly think the EPO's
broad interpretation on this is a step too far by any stretch of the
imagination.
Is this what everyone else thinks or do you have a
different perspective of what this clause means?
|
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)