[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
To: Christian Beauprez <beauprez@beauprez.fsnet.co.uk>
Cc: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] The "as such" clause
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:38:31 +0100 (CET)

> See
>
>       http://swpat.ffii.org/analysis/epc52/
>
> on this.  I'll include a link to your article there.

I'd prefer put 'computer-implemented inventions' into quotes or replace
the term by 'software patents'

The "as such" clause, Christian Beauprez
- Re: [Patents] The "as such" clause, Hartmut Pilch
  - Re: [Patents] The "as such" clause, Hartmut Pilch
    - Re: [Patents] The "as such" clause, Hartmut Pilch
- Re: [Patents] The "as such" clause, Carsten Svaneborg
  - Re: [Patents] The "as such" clause, Hartmut Pilch

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)