[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- To: Christian Beauprez <beauprez@beauprez.fsnet.co.uk>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] The Importance of Potential (continued)
- Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:43:17 +0100 (CET)
> I suppose what I am saying in very simplistic form is that:
>
> While a new machine that contains software maybe patentable
>
> A machine that contains new software is not....
Not quite, because the novelty of the hardware operations might
also be defined by use. E.g. you might have a fully automated chemical
laboratory running a program and thereby bringing a new combination of
forces of nature together to cause a surprising effect. The program for
this is perhaps as simple as A + B = C but the chemistry is quite
unrelated to it. Yet you have a known chemical laboratory with a new
program.
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)