[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- To: Carsten Svaneborg <zqex@mpipks-dresden.mpg.de>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] The "as such" clause
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:52:43 +0200 (CEST)
> > To me this clause is saying that while inventions that include software
> > are
> > allowable, the patent application cannot extend patentability to the
> > computer program itself.
>
> I would basically agree. However the formulation raises the question of
> what is "computer program itself" is it the source code, or the result of
> running the program on a computer or what? etc.
This is an artificial wordplay often used to obscure matters.
In the patent context, a computer program is an entity described by a
program claim. If your "invention" can be described by a program claim
and there is no invention (nothing novel) outside of the scope thus
described, then your patent application relates to a program as such,
regardless of how you claim it.
See Examination Guidelines of 1978 which make this very clear.
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)