[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'pelegrin@labri.fr' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)


Christian Beauprez wrote:
Hi Everyone,
*Thanks to you all for explaining the concept of "forces of nature" to me. *
*I wanted to make public the fact that I was wrong in my earlier assertion that it was obsolete.*
*The problem with the existing doctrine was not that it was incorrect or obsolete, rather that it was difficult to understand from a non-legalistic or "technical" perspective. *

You can find (a start of) an explanation of it in :

http://www.abul.org/brevets/articles/parlement_20030924.php3
(sorry, it is in French)

                                f.p.




(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)