[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'jacek.gancarson@eurofresh.se' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

At last the voice of *legal business* is spoken out clearly here:
 
Bad Patent Reform
03.15.04, 4:39 PM ET

A move by the Federal Trade Commission to overhaul patents could hurt entrepreneurs, experts say. Among the suggestions the FTC has proposed to Congress: The U.S Patent and Trademark Office should be allowed to declare more design innovations to be "obvious" and therefore unworthy of a patent. The PTO should also consider the "harm to competition" that a patent might cause--and reject a claim that's too disruptive to competitors. The FTC would also make it easier to challenge a patent by expanding evidentiary guidelines.

Many venture capitalists and inventors worry that the reform will have a chilling effect on innovation. The system we have now "provides a mechanism for innovators to recoup research investments," says John Reich, of Minneapolis law firm Merchant & Gould, who has represented both inventors and global corporations. Take away patent protection, he adds, and "there's not a lot of incentive to bring products to market."

Not surprisingly, corporations are more enthusiastic about the overhaul. "The changes would as a general matter reduce the potency of a tool used more by small companies," says Polk Wagner, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania.

 
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/inc/2004/03/15/incinnovation.html



(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)