[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'jonas.maebe@ugent.be' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

On 22 apr 2004, at 18:58, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:

is there a good web page that outlines this theory (the programs =
literary works under TRIPS = non-patentable one) in a manner that is
comprehensible to newbies?   I ask because it's a very interesting new
angle, IMO, and I doubt many people outside of the anti-swpat community
know about it yet.

It is not theory, as explained in

http://swpat.ffii.org/analysis/trips/index.en.html

Th text on this topic that Christian presented at the legislation benchmarking conference last week can be found at <http://www.beauprez.net/softpat/ffii-talk140404.html>. It nicely weaves together all the different international treaties and obligations.


Jonas



(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)