[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Bernard Lang <Bernard.Lang@inria.fr>
- To: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>, C-FIT_Community@RealMeasures.dyndns.org, C-FIT_Release_Community@RealMeasures.dyndns.org, fairuse-talk@nyfairuse.org, DMCA_Discuss@lists.microshaft.org, DMCA-Activists@gnu.org, patents@aful.org, fsl-discuss@alt.org
- Cc: rms@gnu.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] [Fwd: TIIP Newsletter 2004-2: Patent Reform]
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:55:49 +0200
what about reacting to this:
http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/world_ip/2004/posters.htm
World Intellectual Property Day 2004
nice confusion they try to promote
equating IP and innovation/creation
Bernard
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 04:09:17PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: TIIP Newsletter 2004-2: Patent Reform
> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:46:53 -0400
> From: Tiip Newsletter <tiip@researchoninnovation.org>
> Reply-To: tiip-owner@v2.listbox.com
> To: <tiip@v2.listbox.com>
>
> Newsletter
> TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
> Issue 2004-2
>
> TWO PROPOSALS TO REFORM THE US PATENT SYSTEM
>
> To view the contents click on:
> http://www.researchoninnovation.org/tiip/index.htm
>
> * * * *
>
> CONTENTS:
> The US economy is highly innovative. Yet in two notable public meetings,
> business executives, economists, judges and lawyers expressed deep concerns
> about the effects of the US patent system on innovation, first at the
> National Academies of Science (2000) and later at the Federal Trade
> Commission and Department of Justice (2002).
>
> Both groups have now followed with proposals for reforming the US patent
> system. Many of the recommendations are highly technical. To facilitate
> public discussion, we analyze the main issues, summarize the proposed
> recommendations and solicit comments
> (http://www.researchoninnovation.org/tiip/archive/issue2004_2.html#comment)
> from readers. In the Fall, we will publish selected comments.
>
> MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS:
> - Patent Standards
> - Patent Office Operation
> - Patent Infringement Litigation
>
> REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
>
> We welcome all readers to submit brief comments (around 500 words). Comments
> can address specific recommendations (e.g., changes to the non-obviousness
> standard), the overall import of the proposed changes, or alternative
> recommendations. We will select comments to publish in the newsletter
> (perhaps excerpting from them), and we may choose to place all comments on
> the TIIP website.
>
>
> ----------
> To unsubscribe from this list, or change the email address where you receive
> messages,
> please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=tiip@v2.listbox.com
>
--
Non aux Brevets Logiciels - No to Software Patents
SIGNEZ http://petition.eurolinux.org/ SIGN
Bernard.Lang@inria.fr ,_ /\o \o/ Tel +33 1 3963 5644
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~lang/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Fax +33 1 3963 5469
INRIA / B.P. 105 / 78153 Le Chesnay CEDEX / France
Je n'exprime que mon opinion - I express only my opinion
CAGED BEHIND WINDOWS or FREE WITH LINUX
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)