[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 09:25 -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
is there a good web page that outlines this theory (the programs =
literary works under TRIPS = non-patentable one) in a manner that is
comprehensible to newbies? I ask because it's a very interesting new
angle, IMO, and I doubt many people outside of the anti-swpat community
know about it yet.
It is not theory, as explained in
http://swpat.ffii.org/analysis/trips/index.en.html
and more exactly in TRIPs Article 10:
http://swpat.ffii.org/analysis/trips/index.en.html#art10
TRIPs Article 10: Computer Programs and Compilations of Data
1. Computer programs, whether in source or object code, shall be
protected as literary works under the Berne Convention (1971).
2. Compilations of data or other material, whether in machine
readable or other form, which by reason of the selection or
arrangement of their contents constitute intellectual creations
shall be protected as such. Such protection, which shall not
extend to the data or material itself, shall be without
prejudice to any copyright subsisting in the data or material
itself.
What fun!
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)