[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Jean-Baptiste Soufron <jbsoufron@free.fr>
- To: Bernard Lang <Bernard.Lang@inria.fr>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Re: patent sharks against critics
- Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 14:55:19 +0200
By the way, I can't find any information about the next meeting of the
Minister Council on 16th and 17th. Are they about to decide a new
directive? A regulation? A decision?
Le mar, 04/05/2004 à 11:46 +0200, Bernard Lang a écrit :
> > Patents are about use.
>
> well ...no longer with the new formulation of the directive.
>
> Since software on a carrier can be claimed regarding infringement, the
> Council is innovating. Description of use, which is what software is,
> can also be an infringement.
> Actually, reproducing the patent itself could be an infringement, if
> the description includes a program that makes use of the patented
> technique (which is what some people believe software patenting is
> about).
>
> Bernard
>
>
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:37:37AM +0200, Hartmut Pilch wrote:
> > > > Europe Shareware received a letter from law firm Jenkens & Gilchrist
> > > > where they ask them to buy a license for the US 4,698,672 patent of
> > > > Compression Labs (the JPEG patent).
> > >
> > > Hum... this is something I'm not sure I understand...
> > >
> > > If I buy a (commercial) software (regardless of proprietary vs. free
> > > issues please) and that software enables me to generate JPEG images (or
> > > MPEG movies or anything covered by a patent... ); do I, as a USER and a
> > > legitimate customer of the company still have get a license for the
> > > patent?
> >
> > Yes.
> > Patents are about use.
> > A user must make sure that his supplier takes the responsibility for all
> > claims.
> > This can be done through a standard contract.
> > Europe Shareware presumably offers such a contract to shareware users and
> > thereby assumes responsibility for patent infringments.
> > They might either act as a clearing house for patent liabilities or pass
> > the responsibility on to the shareware authors.
> > In both cases the burden is very high.
> > It is probably enterpreneurially irresponsible to continue going on doing
> > business under these circumstances.
> >
> > --
> > Hartmut Pilch, FFII & Eurolinux Alliance tel. +49-89-18979927
> > Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation
> > http://swpat.ffii.org/
> > 320,000 votes 2000 firms against software patents
> > http://noepatents.org/
>
> --
> Non aux Brevets Logiciels - No to Software Patents
> SIGNEZ http://petition.eurolinux.org/ SIGN
>
> Bernard.Lang@inria.fr ,_ /\o \o/ Tel +33 1 3963 5644
> http://pauillac.inria.fr/~lang/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Fax +33 1 3963 5469
> INRIA / B.P. 105 / 78153 Le Chesnay CEDEX / France
> Je n'exprime que mon opinion - I express only my opinion
> CAGED BEHIND WINDOWS or FREE WITH LINUX
>
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)