[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'iriXx@iriXx.org' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

Bernard Lang wrote:

The idea isn't to ensure that Microsoft makes a fair profit from its
patents; it's to make sure that no one else can write fully compatible
software.' An older article mentions some other patents."


-------

and Microsoft also officially sponsors the EU presidency ... whatever
that means :

http://www.eu2004.ie/sitetools/sponsorship.asp
The presidency is pushing for fast adopting software patents

Might there be a relation.

what are the consequences in relation to the European Software Directive of 1991 - where interoperability between operating systems is upheld? even in the UK implementation of the EUCD they have been forced to acknowledge that the EU has a prior law enforcing interoperability. perhaps its time to bring the ESD 1991 into our lobbying campaign?

bw,
m~

--
I'd still be mad at the world, even if it apologised. (Sorry).
-- Eminem

www.iriXx.org
www.copyleftmedia.org.uk






(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)