[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Rui Miguel Seabra <rms@1407.org>
- To: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] nice Greg newspeak lapse
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 20:35:00 +0100
- Organization: 1407 Org
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 14:11 -0400, Gregory Aharonian wrote:
> No, that is one of your fallacies. I have repeatedly stated that software
> is just another technology to be handled by the patent system, and that
(...)
> Software is another just another technology comprising processes,
> methods and structures for manipulating physical quantities - information.
Give me a straight answer: should pure human thought be patented?
YES or NO ?
Software is a formal translation of human thought to somehing a machine
can read.
YES or NO ?
> But you all know this. You know copyright offers little to no protection
> for software
Care to show us that with 1+1=2 kind of proof please?
Rui
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)