[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
To: Flemming Bjerke <flem@bjerke.dk>
Cc: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] Re: Re: You have rights.. Software Patents are Illegal
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 21:46:27 +0200 (CEST)

> > Actually, my point is that we should not base our arguments against
> > software patent on philosophical considerations about the relation
> > between mind and matter.
>
> I guess you have no other choice, because you have a poor ontology.

Whether the introductory discourse on software patents (e.g. what is
written on a bumper sticker or on a leaflet) should start with a treatise
on the 4 fources of nature and the 3 worlds of K. Popper is of course an
entirely different question.

Re: [Patents] Re: Re: You have rights.. Software Patents are Illegal, (continued)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)