[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Flemming Bjerke <Flem@Bjerke.dk>
- To: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Which companies are against art 2a and 4.3a?
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:27:42 +0200
- Organization: Hjemme
Torsdag den 10. juni 2004 00:05 skrev Hartmut Pilch:
> > I suspect most of the electronics industry are against this formulation,
> > because they process information. E.g. producers of television and mobile
> > telephones. So, they join the forces with Microsoft and IBM.
>
> If the patents are about processing information, they will usually be
> enforcable in the context of pure software as well, especially in an age
> of convergence. The claims will regularly be broad enough for that.
Sorry, I did not expressed myself clearly. I meant that the electronics
industry to a large extent produces products which transmit, presents, store
etc. information, e.g. mobile telephones and TV's. Perhaps their reading of
art 2a and 4.3a is: patenting of software that control the technique in
mobiles and TVs, is not feasible according to these articles. Although their
purpose of using software is control of technique, rather than computing,
they see themselved included. Such a reading will push them into the arms of
Microsoft, IBM, etc. And this enforces the resistance from big business
against these paragrafs.
Flemming
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)