[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason)
- To: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Spamcop tax on NGOs
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:31:13 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hartmut Pilch writes:
> I sent the following to our administrators.
>
> Subject: Re: [SpamCop
> (http://swpat.ffii.org/news/03/plen0924/index.en.html)
> id:1064566953]FFII
> EU Voters Guide Page
>
> It seems that someone on the fsfeurope list where Seth Johnson sent his
> mail was angry and then went to Spamcop and gave us trouble. The trouble
> is even greater when we send out mail to our supporters, i.e. people who
> have agreed explicitely to receiving such mails and can unsubscribe any
> time but prefer reporting to Spamcop to the hassle of reading a short
> text with brain switched on.
bad news. However, did it actually have any effect? Spamcop have a
"threshold" system, whereby multiple reports are required before something
is considered spam, if I recall correctly. So it should not have caused
any trouble, unless there were others.
- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQFAzqXBQTcbUG5Y7woRAvNrAJ4jW4914IL7QJOywSPed6D8CyDeawCg1mKG
grKHGG67Ozo5wbqYvzNfq8o=
=hcih
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)