[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- To: Simo Sorce <simo.sorce@xsec.it>
- Cc: jean-luc@halleux.org, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] how far will they go ?
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:14:32 +0200 (CEST)
> > There is no limit to how far the Council wants to go. Try to propose a
> > rules that clearly excludes any economically interesting subject matter
> > from patentability, and you can be sure they will be against that rule.
>
> Well, it depends on who is ecnomically interested, and how. :-)
"All practical solutions", as explained in
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/jwip-schar98/
or, in US terminology, "anything useful".
This excludes esthetic creations but not much more. And as we know from
http://www.patenting-art.com/
the latter exclusion is also not really stable. What makes it fairly
stable is probably not some doctrine but the fact that patents on esthetic
creations are not really worthwhile because they would usually be too
narrow and avoidable without much pain.
--
Hartmut Pilch, FFII & Eurolinux Alliance tel. +49-89-18979927
Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
330,000 votes 3000 firms against software patents http://noepatents.org/
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)