[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'ehj@cleosan.com' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
Simo Sorce wrote:
Seem that godado (www.godado.it) claim to have a patent on search
engines and is trying to stop other site from offering search
capabilities in their own sites.

Uk patent: GB2362971
EPO request n: 01112245.4

The EP patent is only A2, and as far as understand that means it is not yet granted:

   http://register.epoline.org/espacenet/regviewer?AP=EP20010112245

Here some info from one of the victimis (italian only):
http://www.portalino.it/contenzioso/frontpage.html

Here the JPG of the letter sent:
http://www.portalino.it/contenzioso/materiale/godado1.jpg

Seems the GB patent is granted though.

//Erik


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)