[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Erik Josefsson <ehj@cleosan.com>
- To: Davide Dozza <davide.dozza@yacme.com>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Software patents strikes in Italy.
- Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 19:43:50 +0200
Davide Dozza wrote:
Simo, do you think we can try to invalid such patent?
What are the precedures we should follow in order to demonstrate this is
not prior art or better this is not patentable?
For a single patent I'd suggest you have a look at FFII opposition to
the amazon patent.
http://swpat.ffii.org/news/04/amaz0125/index.en.html
Otherwise, I would like a more massive action. Like collecting all
patents with "computer program product"-claims and submit a general
objection. Like for example this one:
"11. A computer program product for execution by a general purpose
computer for providing state information in a stateless data
communication protocol, said computer program product including
instructions for making said general purpose computer perform the
steps of the method of one of claims 1 to 10."
http://gauss.bacon.su.se/EP/1/0/EP1081612.html#claim
As well as politically defeat software patents through legislation.
//Erik
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)