[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
To: Rui Miguel Seabra <rms@1407.org>
Cc: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics"
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:55:56 +0200 (CEST)

> Greg, it is obvious from your answer that absolutely everything is
> patentable if it envolves energy expenditure.

No, only that everything is technical/physical.

Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Gregory Aharonian
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Christian Beauprez
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Rui Miguel Seabra
  - Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Hartmut Pilch
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Carsten Svaneborg
  - Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Hartmut Pilch
    - Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Carsten Svaneborg
      - Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Simo Sorce
      - Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Hartmut Pilch
        
        Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Carsten Svaneborg
        
        Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Hartmut Pilch
        
        Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Seth Johnson
        
        Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Hartmut Pilch
        Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Seth Johnson

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)