[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
- To: Simo Sorce <simo.sorce@xsec.it>
- Cc: Jean-Luc Halleux <jean-luc@halleux.org>, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics"
- Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:55:34 +0200 (CEST)
> > Then you need to read some court decisions, perhaps starting with Diamond
> > v. Diehr, which is very well written and interesting, especially due to
> > the dissenting minority opininon which is also codified in it.
>
> Hartmut, is that available on-line?
At
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/diehr81/
we currently have only a german translation, the original will follow next
week.
European court decisions that you should have read, available in English,
are
BGH Disposition Program 1976
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/bgh-dispo76/
BGH Rolling-Rod Splitting 1980
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/bgh-walzst80/
We have no english version of the german correspondent to Diamond v. Diehr
BGH ABS 1980
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/bgh-abs80/
and the later
BGH Operating System 1990
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/bgh1-bs90/
which says that operating system software is not technical and that
the spheres of copyright and patents must be separate (similar to
Disposition Program).
It would be very helpful to have these translated to English as well.
There are also a few pro-swpat decisions from BGH in the mean time
(starting with 'Seitenpuffer' (side buffer) of 1991 and culminating in
'Sprachanalyse' (language analysis) of 2000) and a few new BGH/BPatG
decisions
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/bpatg17-suche00/
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/bgh-suche01/
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/bpatg17-suche02/
which show attempts to move back.
Moreover, from the EPO,
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/epo-t850022/
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/epo-gl78/
are a must read. They show the correct interpretation of the EPC which
the EPO changed, "under the pressure of the industry" as commentators of
the time mostly report, in 1986.
For a historicy overview of this caselaw shift, see
http://swpat.ffii.org/log/intro/
--
Hartmut Pilch, FFII & Eurolinux Alliance tel. +49-89-18979927
Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/
330,000 votes 3000 firms against software patents http://noepatents.org/
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", (continued)
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Hartmut Pilch
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Seth Johnson
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Hartmut Pilch
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Seth Johnson
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Carsten Svaneborg
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Hartmut Pilch
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Jean-Luc Halleux
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Hartmut Pilch
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Simo Sorce
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Jonas Maebe
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", Hartmut Pilch
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Carsten Svaneborg
- Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Hartmut Pilch
Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Xavi Drudis Ferran
Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics",
Erik Josefsson
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)