[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>
To: Carsten Svaneborg <zqex@mpipks-dresden.mpg.de>
Cc: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics"
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:44:45 +0200 (CEST)

> > European court decisions that you should have read, available in English,
> > are
>
> Is the whole and uncommented version of Schar's deconstruction of
> "natural forces" online somewhere?

ask Google.

I don't think he does much to deconstruct "natural forces". He just
presumes that his audience agrees on not wanting to limit patentability.
He needs the old doctrine only as a reference pattern for reformulating
the current practise of the EPO into a new doctrine.

Re: [Patents] "Betrayal of physics", (continued)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)