X-Sympa-To: patents
Return-Path: <ehj@cleosan.com>
Delivered-To: patents@aful.org
Received: from av5-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av5-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.111])
	by stabilite.aful.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253B166B9B
	for <patents@aful.org>; Tue,  3 Aug 2004 21:05:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by av5-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id B76E63803C; Tue,  3 Aug 2004 21:03:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.183])
	by av5-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A908137E87
	for <patents@aful.org>; Tue,  3 Aug 2004 21:03:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from cleosan.com (h14n2fls33o988.telia.com [213.67.225.14])
	by smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9560637E51
	for <patents@aful.org>; Tue,  3 Aug 2004 21:03:59 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <410FE19E.30209@cleosan.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 21:03:58 +0200
From: Erik Josefsson <ehj@cleosan.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040229)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: patents@aful.org
Subject: "person skilled in the art"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Validation-by: ehj@cleosan.com

I ran into some texts about the "person skilled in the art", 
"fackmannen" in swedish.

Can you challange in court that the examination was not done by a 
"person skilled in the art"?

Is the examiner at the patent office a "person skilled in the art" by 
definition?

//Erik

