[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Erik Josefsson <ehj@cleosan.com>
- To: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Pamela Samuelson
- Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 03:38:26 +0200
Legally Speaking: Why Reform the U.S. Patent System?
By
Pamela Samuelson
Computing professionals have been complaining for years about "bad"
software and Internet-related patents. Now there's something they can do
about it: Support reforms of the U.S. patent system recommended in three
recent high profile reports--one issued by the Federal Trade Commission,
one by the National Academy of Sciences, and one by the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office [1, 3, 5]. One short column cannot hope to do justice
to all of the recommendations in these reports. But it is possible to
highlight three key reforms that deserve support.
http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~pam/papers/cacm%20patent%20reform.pdf
- Pamela Samuelson, Erik Josefsson
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)