[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'ehj@cleosan.com' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

Legally Speaking: Why Reform the U.S. Patent System?
By
Pamela Samuelson

Computing professionals have been complaining for years about "bad" software and Internet-related patents. Now there's something they can do about it: Support reforms of the U.S. patent system recommended in three recent high profile reports--one issued by the Federal Trade Commission, one by the National Academy of Sciences, and one by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office [1, 3, 5]. One short column cannot hope to do justice
to all of the recommendations in these reports. But it is possible to highlight three key reforms that deserve support.

http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~pam/papers/cacm%20patent%20reform.pdf




(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)