[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Bernard Lang <Bernard.Lang@inria.fr>
- To: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] GregNews: copyright shutting down 321 studios
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:30:25 +0200
The sophistry of the aharonian netbot should be to all a clear
indication that it is not trying to discuss, or to untangle issues,
but only attempting to waste your time, force you to unveil arguments
so that counter-argument can be prepared to counter you when you
discuss in a real context that matters.
The aharonian has not produced any useful information on this list for
a long time. You should refrain from any exchange with this netbot,
since it can only be counter productive, and a waste of your time.
but, as Harmut is doing, it is always useful to check how it is
misleading others, including the Pope of Trinity College.
Bernard
* Hartmut Pilch <phm@a2e.de>, le 16-08-04, a écrit:
> Greg Aharonian's Internet Patnet News Service and this law was deadly to
> 321 Studios, (http://swpat.ffii.org/players/aharonian/) reports about a
> DMCA lawsuit against 321 Studios Inc, a company that was writing software
> for circumventing copy-prevention mechanisms. Because the DMCA contains
> the word "copyright" in its name, Greg concludes that copyright is a very
> dangerous weapon, more dangerous than patents.
>
> Anti-circumvention laws apply to patented goods as well. In fact they may
> even apply when there is no "IP" at all, e.g. when someone burns 18th
> century archives from a library to a copylocked disk. Anti-circumvention
> laws do not define any exclusivity scope, they are an orthogonal issue.
>
> Greg seems to have been misled by naming.
>
> This may be noteworthy, since GregNews is widely received and Greg's
> pro-patent anti-copyright texts are often cited and taken seriously by
> scholars such as Prof. William Kingston of Trinity College (a kind of
> IP pope in the UK and Ireland).
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> - COPYRIGHT LAWS SHUT DOWN SOFTWARE COMPANY
>
> I confess - I was wrong - intellectual property laws can be use to shut
> down software companies. The FFII crowd is right. A small company in
> the US was just forced out of business because of IP laws. My apology
> to FFII - IP laws can be used to hurt software companies. So I would
> like to propose that FFII start a campaign to eliminate this form of
> IP that was used to shut down a software company. This form of IP is
> I guess a real threat. The form of IP:
>
> software copyright
>
> So it is time for me to agree with FFII and encourage you to start an
> effort to eliminate this form of IP that is actually hurting software
> companies (as opposed to the hallunicogenic fantasies of the Munich city
> government), an IP law that is really hurting software companies -
> software copyright. Cut the crap about bad software patents being the
> only boogie monster in the IP world.
>
> ====
>
> 321 Studios Shuts Its Doors
> By Katie Dean, WIRED Magazine, 04:10 PM Aug. 03, 2004 PT
>
> 321 Studios, the company that sold DVD-copying software and faced an
> avalanche of lawsuits from the entertainment industry, shut down Monday.
> The St. Charles, Missouri, company made DVD-X Copy and DVD Copy Plus --
> programs that allowed users to make backup copies of their commercial DVDs.
> Hollywood studios filed several lawsuits to force the company to stop
> selling
> its products, saying the company was helping pirates. The Missouri company
> had denied any wrongdoing, claiming DVD purchasers had the right to make
> copies for personal use.
>
> "They've ceased operations," said Michael Page, an attorney with Keker &
> Van Nest, who represented 321 Studios. "They couldn't afford to do
> business and fight all the legal fights. They essentially got sued out
> of existence."
>
> In February, Judge Susan Illston of the Northern District Federal Court
> for California ruled that 321 Studios' products violated copyright law.
> The studios argued that 321's software bypassed CSS, the digital locks
> that protect the content. Any mechanism that circumvents these locks is
> a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. In response, 321
> countered that its customers have a right to make personal copies.
> Illston sided with the studios.
>
> The company appealed the ruling. Page said he had filed a brief in the
> appeal Friday. He said there were seven lawsuits, including some in the
> United Kingdom, against the company at one point. "It's really
> unfortunate that we can't get one of (the lawsuits) to an appellate
> court and get (the court) to look at the DMCA issues," Page said.
>
> The shutdown "doesn't come as a surprise," said Fred von Lohmann, an
> attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "The injunctions had
> made it impossible for them to continue to sell any products."
>
> --
> Hartmut Pilch, FFII & Eurolinux Alliance tel. +49-89-18979927
> Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation
> http://swpat.ffii.org/
> 330,000 votes 3000 firms against software patents http://noepatents.org/
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)