Re: [Patents] Re: [C-FIT_Community] This Takes the Cake

[Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>]

Seth Johnson wrote:
> 
> Still made me laugh.  So shoot me.  :-)  I guess I'll send the
> guy a recommendation that he take that out.


He could just post the patent itself, at:

> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,587,846.WKU.&OS=PN/6,587,846&RS=PN/6,587,846

Or pull out the "Ten Ethical Laws of Robotics" toward the bottom,
combined with a link to the patent, and maybe a link to the
article as well.


Seth


> Jonas Maebe wrote:
> >
> > On 24 aug 2004, at 06:29, Seth Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > Observe: http://paultopia.org/pat/
> >
> > I don't see why the copyright infringement on the original article was
> > necessary (or even desirable). If anything, it weakens the message and
> > muddles the whole issue.
> >
> > Jonas
> 
> --
> 
> DRM is Theft!  We are the Stakeholders!
> 
> New Yorkers for Fair Use
> http://www.nyfairuse.org
> 
> [CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc
> 
> I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or
> distribution of this incidentally recorded communication.
> Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so
> far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in
> ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
> exclusive rights.

-- 

DRM is Theft!  We are the Stakeholders!

New Yorkers for Fair Use
http://www.nyfairuse.org

[CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc

I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or
distribution of this incidentally recorded communication. 
Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so
far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in
ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
exclusive rights.