X-Sympa-To: patents
Return-Path: <rms@gnu.org>
Delivered-To: patents@aful.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164])
	by stabilite.aful.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE0275736
	for <patents@aful.org>; Fri,  1 Oct 2004 00:13:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CD97m-0001hc-MH; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:10:06 -0400
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>
Cc: C-FIT_Community@RealMeasures.dyndns.org,
	C-FIT_Release_Community@RealMeasures.dyndns.org,
	fairuse-talk@nyfairuse.org, DMCA_Discuss@lists.microshaft.org,
	DMCA-Activists@gnu.org, patents@aful.org, fsl-discuss@lists.alt.org
In-reply-to: <415B9763.D4C80836@RealMeasures.dyndns.org> (message from Seth
	Johnson on Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:19:31 -0400)
Subject: Re: On Software Patents, Sender-ID, and MARID
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
References:  <415B9763.D4C80836@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>
Message-Id: <E1CD97m-0001hc-MH@fencepost.gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:10:06 -0400
X-Validation-by: rms@gnu.org

It looks like the article mentions favorably my warning that
Microsoft's license prohibits all free software licenses,
but worded this in a way that misleadingly suggests that
I was talking about "open source".

I would like to write to the publishers of this article
to ask them to correct that point.  Seth, can you tell me
where to write to?

