[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'beauprez@beauprez.fsnet.co.uk' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
You can find the UKPO/ and the UK's Department of Trade and Industry paper at:
 
http://www.patent.gov.uk/about/ippd/issues/softpat.pdf
 
 
And a one page answer that quotes from the Commission's own report (at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/indprop/comp/com02-92en.pdf)
that contradict what the DTI/UKPO are saying:
 
http://www.beauprez.net/softpat/DTIpatent.html  (or pdf)
 
 

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)