[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Richard Page <richard_page@dsl.pipex.com>
- To: Patent Forum <patents@aful.org>
- Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Patents] Dreadful Guardian Article]
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:21:23 +0000
The Guardian is owned by The Scott Trust,
http://www.gmgplc.co.uk/gmgplc/scott/scottintro/
I have had one article published in their computer section but editorial
understanding in the business section is lacking.
The interesting point in all these documents is that they insist that
the directive has nothing to do with software.
Well ... that is precisely what the amendments were about.
In any case, we do not expect much coming from a US subsidiary.
and who is controlling the Guardian anyway
Bernard
Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?
* Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe@ugent.be>, le 16-11-04, a écrit:
On 16 nov 2004, at 14:32, Richard Page wrote:
>http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,1351216,00.html
>
>A little one sided you may think
It's merely a rewrite of EICTA's PR, so it's quite logical...
Jonas
- [Fwd: Re: [Patents] Dreadful Guardian Article], Richard Page
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)