[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'richard_page@dsl.pipex.com' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

The Guardian is owned by The Scott Trust,

http://www.gmgplc.co.uk/gmgplc/scott/scottintro/

I have had one article published in their computer section but editorial understanding in the business section is lacking.

The interesting point in all these documents is that they insist that
the directive has nothing to do with software.

Well ... that is precisely what the amendments were about.

In any case, we do not expect much coming from a US subsidiary.
and who is controlling the Guardian anyway

Bernard

Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?

* Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe@ugent.be>, le 16-11-04, a écrit:

On 16 nov 2004, at 14:32, Richard Page wrote:

>http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,1351216,00.html
>
>A little one sided you may think

It's merely a rewrite of EICTA's PR, so it's quite logical...


Jonas








(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)