Re: [Fwd: Re: [Patents] Dreadful Guardian Article]

[James Heald <j.heald@ucl.ac.uk>]

Erik Josefsson wrote:

> I remeber McGann also read loud from the Council text, the 
> "normal physical interactions" from article 4a.2). I took it up and 
> asked the audience to think about the clarity of such a law compairing 
> with something more understandable like normal interaction between a 
> recepie and a kitchen.
>
> McGann came up top me afterwards and invited me to his house saying if I 
> ever came by, he would show me some interaction between a recipie and a 
> kitchen I would not consider normal :-)

LOL !

Does that mean we now have to talk of chemical reaction patents as 
"recipe-enabled inventions" ?   :-)