[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Nari Lee <narlee@utu.fi>
- To: Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe@ugent.be>
- Cc: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] IBM Patent release
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:39:38 +0200
- Priority: normal
Hello Jonas Maebe
Thank you for your comment.
What I want to know more is how useful these sofwares that are covered by
these released patents are to the actual developement of Open Source Software
community, technically. I am also curious whethere there are any that could
be any of these patents related to W3C standards or other so called open
standards?
Any idea?
Nari
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe@ugent.be>
Date: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:31 am
Subject: Re: [Patents] IBM Patent release
>
> On 24 jan 2005, at 09:23, Nari Lee wrote:
>
> > I have received the following info.
> > http://www.ibm.com/ibm/licensing/patents/pledgedpatents.pdf
> > Anybody on this list knows or care to comment on the utility of
> any of
> > these patents
>
> They're useful because they clearly admit those are software
> patents,
> and at least 44 of them are granted in Europe as well
> (http://kwiki.ffii.org/IbmEp0501En). Nevertheless, all of those
> would
> be considered "computer-implemented inventions which make a
> technical
> contribution" under the proposed Commission and Council texts.
>
> > or why IBM is doing this "really"?
>
> PR.
>
>
> Jonas
>
>
>
- Re: [Patents] IBM Patent release, Nari Lee
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)