[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'ehj@cleosan.com' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
If you want to comment on the patents replace PatWIKI in the urls on

   http://kwiki.ffii.org/IbmEp0501En

with View, eg:

   http://gauss.ffii.org/View/EP795823/Comments

Gauss is beeing rebuilt, sorry for the inconvinience.

//Erik


Jonas Maebe wrote:

On 24 jan 2005, at 09:39, Nari Lee wrote:

What I want to know more is how useful these sofwares that are covered by these released patents are to the actual developement of Open Source Software community, technically.


I don't know. You would have to start reading the claims of the individual patents to find that out, and I really don't have time for that.

I am also curious whethere there are any that could be any of these patents related to W3C standards or other so called open standards?


That is quite possible.


Jonas





(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)